Project Year
2009
Region(s)
Latin America and the Caribbean
Country(ies)
Paraguay
Project Description
This dissertation project examines the relationship in social practice between forms
of commercial capitalism and microcredit based economic development in Paraguay’s
free trade zone of Ciudad del Este. This project is an effort to triangulate the modes
of social regulation that produce forms of obligation and attachment through debt
instruments as well as the modes of social differentiation that separate and distinguish
different forms of credit in Ciudad del Este for businesses that face pervasive economic
exclusion.
Researcher(s)
Caroline Schuster
About the Researcher(s)
Caroline Schuster is a doctoral candidate in the Sociocultural Anthropology department of the University
of Chicago. Her research interests center on microcredit-based poverty alleviation
programs, which build on training in Development Studies at Stanford University, where
she completed her undergraduate degree in 2005.
Synopsis of Research Results
This research project is an ethnographic investigation of a microcredit-based development
initiative in Ciudad del Este, a commercial “special customs zone” on Paraguay’s triple-frontier
with Brazil and Argentina. As a border town, much of the economic activity in Ciudad
del Este is based on cross-border trade. I began this project with an interest in
how development projects that aim at financial inclusion operate in a city already
configured by extensive commercial activity: even marginal neighborhoods in Ciudad
del Este are caught up in the financial flows of cross-border trade and petty arbitrage. If
the microfinance Non-Government Organization (NGO)— Fundación Paraguaya —is working through solidarity loans to foster entrepreneurship in its committees of women entrepreneurs, how is the institutional notion of entrepreneurship similar to or different from the
lived-experience of commerce in the ‘special customs zone?’ How does microcredit-based
development fit into the many small-scale credit options available in Ciudad del Este?
Through eighteen months of participant observation with Fundación Paraguaya, its clients, and officials charged with regulating financial institutions in Ciudad
del Este, I have come to appreciate the many different ways that credit configures
the economic lives and livelihoods of Paraguayans living along at the edges of Ciudad
del Este’s commercial economy. Through the course of this research, I have been
most surprised by the complicated ways in which people manage the many time-scales
that configure credit; debt is largely about deferral, then how long financial commitments
can (and ultimately cannot) be postponed is a complex social process. I am finding
that much of the ‘entrepreneurship’ in microcredit-based committees of women entrepreneurs involves successfully managing social relationships that transmit and store wealth
over time. And if entrepreneurship is fundamentally about calibrating risk and return,
then women made ‘entrepreneurial’ by microfinance must manage the risks and rewards
of joint social and economic obligation as well as the uncertainties of their business
ventures. And since credit is a financial technology that extends into the future,
much of the work of committees involves not just individual enterprise, but rather successfully cultivating those
relationships and seeing them into the future as well.
If credit and development initiatives both are an effort in some sense to ‘see into
the future,’ how do the obligations produced by microfinance reflect both the predictability and rigor imposed by the financial technology [with its intransigent
payment schedule and cyclical scaling-up of both credit and savings], as well as the
uncertainties of the ‘solidarities’ imposed by joint-borrowing? My research engages
with the many modalities of credit and debt that organize daily economic life in Ciudad
del Este and the sites of authority that produce and (or foreclose) those relationships
of credit and repayment (or non-payment). Microcredit is surely not the only source
of credit for poor women working in the informal economy on the border. Microfinance
borrowers often pay for home appliances on installment plans, pay a monthly quota
for their land parcel, have a tab at the local grocery shop, and have multiple small
loans with both formal and informal lenders. The authority to lend as well as to borrow,
and the power to speed up or slow down payment or repayment are all economic processes;
they hinge in part on what might be broadly glossed as ‘market mechanisms,’ but also
are caught up with the micropolitics of kinship and neighborhood, as well as national
concerns like Paraguay’s wide-reaching credit check service, panoply currency exchange
rates (especially on the border), and national banking laws and regulations.
Gender, commerce and entrepreneurship
The puzzle of ‘commerce’ is particularly perplexing for me, because most of my data
deals with acute poverty. Many of my contacts claim that they are sogué (Guarani word meaning lack, not enough). Sogué is conjugated as a descriptive adjective—a personal characteristic—not a noun or
transitive verb (a state or condition) like in English, which might imply a temporary
condition. How is it that people who are persistently and inescapably sogué, or necesitando (v., needing) also merchants and entrepreneurs? And must we rethink vocational categories
like merchant and entrepreneur to incorporate their economic endeavors? Much of the
value of “committees of women entrepreneurs” in Ciudad del Este is their capacity to incorporate relationships with strangers
[it is common to distinguish between conocidos (people who know one another) and persona ajeno(a) (‘others,’ strangers)], and turn those relationships with strangers into intimate
relationships that can sustain and transfer wealth. This guards against the vulnerability
of personally being sogué, if one can count of having economic support when one is “needing.” Commerce and
conditions of need are mutually linked while also aimed to mitigate one another.
Microcredit is a particular instance of credit, used in the case of Fundación Paraguaya to promote “committees of women entrepreneurs.” How, then, does “entrepreneurship”
fit in with the question of (1) credit [especially credit directed at poor women]
and (2) commerce? How do the cycles of time/(logics/rigors/payment structures) within
microcredit structure commercial relations within the group, and connect the group
to other socially meaningful individuals or collectivities? “Committees” are very
good at mobilizing kin and neighbor relations to capture and accumulate value in order
to repay loans to the microcredit organization (via neighborhood raffles, bake sales,
parties, &c). What does this mean for the circulation of wealth within a “solidarity
group”, if it is constantly sustained by the influx of monies from relationships that
span and connect the committee to other social groupings? And how might these linkages
relate to ideas about “entrepreneurial” activity?
Being able to take advantage of a “good deal” often relies on having the authority
to manage a multitude of obligations and connections in ‘real time.’ That sort of
authority is highly gendered for my contacts in “committees of women entrepreneurs” because women in particular are enmeshed in a dense web of obligations and commitments;
obligations that are often “cotizado” (valued, estimated, paid) in a staggering variety of media and which ‘come due’
over short and long term cycles of debt and repayment. Caring relationships are caught
up with economic relationships, particularly for women; there are specific types of
“return” (food, cleaning, care-giving) that are highly gendered and only occasionally
remunerative, but which cement women’s self-production in ways that often intercalate
with work related to commerce and credit.
This project is an attempt to track the many sites of social obligation that regulate
economic activity. This is especially important for highly regulated microcredit-based
development projects, which, at first glance, might seem like a unique case with few
similarities to ‘normal’ markets and economies. However, I would like to argue that
the solidarities (or lack thereof) that configure microfinance are not all that different
from the questions of authority, temporality, risk and value at the heart of credit
relationships generally. Development projects with a mission of poverty alleviation
share many affinities with the aspirations, hopes and fears that lead us to anticipate
economic outcomes and plan for our financial future. Living on credit is a reminder
that few economic processes are merely transactions based on a one-time exchange,
but rather involve complicated relationships built over time and including many intercalated
obligations and responsibilities. In Ciudad del Este, a city with a commercial economy
where value and price are indeed often equivalent (as neo-classical economists postulate),
the instances of non-equivalence—where multiple values are at play and often inconvertible
or non-transferable across circuits of relationships—are particularly telling.
connect with us